The Kaitchup – AI on a Budget

The Kaitchup – AI on a Budget

Share this post

The Kaitchup – AI on a Budget
The Kaitchup – AI on a Budget
RTX 6000 Pro vs H100 & A100: Best Single-GPU Choice for Fast, Low-Cost LLM Fine-Tuning
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More

RTX 6000 Pro vs H100 & A100: Best Single-GPU Choice for Fast, Low-Cost LLM Fine-Tuning

Faster, cheaper single-GPU training

Benjamin Marie's avatar
Benjamin Marie
Jun 16, 2025
∙ Paid
6

Share this post

The Kaitchup – AI on a Budget
The Kaitchup – AI on a Budget
RTX 6000 Pro vs H100 & A100: Best Single-GPU Choice for Fast, Low-Cost LLM Fine-Tuning
Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More
1
Share

NVIDIA is now regularly rolling out new GPUs based on the Blackwell architecture. In a previous article, we saw that the RTX 5090 was the fastest GPU for single-GPU workloads (fine-tuning and inference) with 32 GB of memory or less. We also walked through how to configure PyTorch and major frameworks to run and fine-tune LLMs.

Fine-Tuning and Inference with an RTX 5090

Fine-Tuning and Inference with an RTX 5090

Benjamin Marie
·
Mar 24
Read full story

However, 32 GB is often not enough for training LLMs, especially if you want to avoid relying on parameter-efficient tuning methods like LoRA or QLoRA. That’s where the RTX 6000 Pro appears like a good alternative to the RTX 5090. Built on the same core architecture as the RTX 5090 but with 96 GB of VRAM, it’s rapidly gaining adoption, particularly in cloud environments.

Take RunPod (referral link), for example: the RTX 6000 Pro currently costs $1.79/hour, i.e., just a few cents more than an A100 and nearly $1 less than an H100.

A GPU that’s as fast as the RTX 5090, offers triple the memory, and is cheaper than the H100? Sounds too good to be true.

The Kaitchup – AI on a Budget is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

In this article, we’ll benchmark the A100, H100, and RTX 6000 Pro to see how they compare in LLM fine-tuning. Here’s what we’ll cover:

  1. Architecture Comparison: We’ll start by reviewing the core specs of each GPU to understand where the RTX 6000 Pro stands out.

  2. Environment Setup: You’ll learn how to set up PyTorch, FlashAttention, Transformers, Bitsandbytes, and all the standard tooling for fine-tuning on the RTX 6000 Pro.
    Spoiler: The same setup I recommended for the RTX 5090 works out-of-the-box here too.

  3. Performance Tests: We'll run benchmarks for QLoRA, LoRA, and full fine-tuning, comparing performance across the three GPUs.

In every category, the RTX 6000 Pro emerges as the top choice, making it the most cost-effective option, and the fastest (!), for single-GPU fine-tuning of LLMs.

The following notebook shows how to set up the environment for the RTX 6000 Pro and fine-tune LLMs (full, LoRA, and QLoRA), using Qwen3 for the examples.

Get the notebook (#171)

Since vLLM installation with the RTX 6000 Pro can be tricky, I’ve included a bonus section that walks you through the complete setup.

Comparing the RTX 6000 Pro to the H100 and A100: Key Specifications

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 The Kaitchup
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share

Copy link
Facebook
Email
Notes
More